On the history of Orthodox cemeteries in Tomsk at the turn of the 19th ‒ 20th centuries: Visual images of funeral culture at the turning point of epochs

Keywords: funeral culture, cemetery, temple, grave markers, visual image, Peter Khandorin, memoirs, urban myth

Abstract

The article analyzes visual images of funerary culture at the turn of the 19th ‒ 20th centuries based on the material of Orthodox urban cemeteries in Tomsk. This analysis is based on official documentation, memoires and mass media sources. During this period there was a confrontation between two burial traditions: the ancient Russian one, which assumed the
construction of necropoleis on consecrated grounds near the temple, and the rationalistic one which became widespread from the 2nd half of the 18th century. An example of the ancient Russian tradition is the necropoleis attached to the monasteries of Tomsk. On the basis of a rationalistic concept, the Voznesenskoye cemetery was built outside the city, however, it was not possible to fully realize the rational concept of a necropolis. A unique example of the devastating consequences of the confrontation between the two burial traditions was the story of the Preobrazhenskoe Cemetery in Tomsk: having arisen spontaneously and being considered Orthodox, it did not have its own temple, but was named after the nearest parish church. The location of a necropolis on unsanctified land deprived its space of sacred meaning, which caused the lack of amenities of the cemetery – the lack of a full-fledged fence, the neglect of graves. At the same time, the appearance of tombstones and crosses, which were white in color, indicates the preservation of the Christian understanding of death in the consciousness of the masses. At the beginning of the 20th century, with the increase of secularization of society, an atheistic funeral culture was formed, associated with the cult of the heroes of the revolution and the necropolis as a place of remembrance of their exploits. This is how the Soviet cemetery near Preobrazhensky appears and attempts are being made to create a special semantics of this necropolis using revolutionary symbols. But the cemetery's existence was short-lived. After the closure of both Soviet and Orthodox cemeteries they were completely destroyed during the Second World War, and the leading role was played not by the authorities, but by the population, whose vandalism led to the destruction of necropolies. Thus, the destruction of the funeral culture occurred which was the result of a systemic ideological and spiritual crisis.

Author Biography

N. I. Sazonova, Tomsk State Pedagogical University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-34-52

Natalia I. Sazonova
Tomsk State Pedagogical University,
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics,
Tomsk, Russia
nataly-sib@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0562-1397

Abstract
The article analyzes visual images of funerary culture at the turn of the 19th ‒ 20th centuries based on the material of Orthodox urban cemeteries in Tomsk. This analysis is based on official documentation, memoires and mass media sources. During this period there was a confrontation between two burial traditions: the ancient Russian one, which assumed the construction of necropoleis on consecrated grounds near the temple, and the rationalistic one which became widespread from the 2nd half of the 18th century. An example of the ancient Russian tradition is the necropoleis attached to the monasteries of Tomsk. On the basis of a rationalistic concept, the Voznesenskoye cemetery was built outside the city, however, it was not possible to fully realize the rational concept of a necropolis. A unique example of the devastating consequences of the confrontation between the two burial traditions was the story of the Preobrazhenskoe Cemetery in Tomsk: having arisen spontaneously and being considered Orthodox, it did not have its own temple, but was named after the nearest parish church. The location of a necropolis on unsanctified land deprived its space of sacred meaning, which caused the lack of amenities of the cemetery – the lack of a full-fledged fence, the neglect of graves. At the same time, the appearance of tombstones and crosses, which were white in color, indicates the preservation of the Christian understanding of death in the consciousness of the masses. At the beginning of the 20th century, with the increase of secularization of society, an atheistic funeral culture was formed, associated with the cult of the heroes of the revolution and the necropolis as a place of remembrance of their exploits. This is how the Soviet cemetery near Preobrazhensky appears and attempts are being made to create a special semantics of this necropolis using revolutionary symbols. But the cemetery's existence was short-lived. After the closure of both Soviet and Orthodox cemeteries they were completely destroyed during the Second World War, and the leading role was played not by the authorities, but by the population, whose vandalism led to the destruction of necropolies. Thus, the destruction of the funeral culture occurred which was the result of a systemic ideological and spiritual crisis.

Keywords: funeral culture, cemetery, temple, grave markers, visual image, Peter Khandorin, memoirs, urban myth.

References

Appeal 1905 – Appeal of the City Council to the City Duma of Tomsk, 1905. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. 233. Reg. 2. Cas. 233. P. 2. In Russian.

Borey 2017 – Borey V. I. The abolition of Moscow parish churchyards and the creation of the first urban cemeteries after the events of 1771. Historical, Philosophical, Political and Legal Sciences, Cultural Studies and Art Criticism. Questions of Theory and Practice. 2017. 5 (79). P. 24–26. In Russian.

Copy 1874 – A copy from the Journal of the Tomsk City Duma dated November 1, 1874, made on March 18, 1875. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. 233. Reg. 2. Cas. 78. P. 1.

Dashevskaya, Shtonda 2017 – Dashevskaya Z. M., Shtonda Yu. A. The emergence and development of the rite of Christian burial in Byzantium in the 10th – 12th centuries. The Quarterly Journal of Saint Philaret’s Institute. 2017. 24. Pp. 46‒60. In Russian.

Dmitrienko 2013 – Tomsk Necropolis. Southern Cemetery Is. 2: West Side. Ed. by N. M. Dmitrienko. Tomsk, 2013. In Russian.

Dmitrienko, Mongush 2012 – Dmitrienko N. M., Mongush A. A. On the publication of mourning messages in the Tomsk newspaper ‘Krasnoe Znamya’ (1940–1962). Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. 363. Pp. 89‒91. In Russian.

Journal 1880 ‒ Extract from the Journal of the Tomsk City Duma on May 29, 1880. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. 233. Reg. 2. Cas. 78. Pp. 11‒12. In Russian.

Kartashev 1914 ‒ The Reference book for the Tomsk diocese of 1914. Ed. by Kartashev. Tomsk, 1914. In Russian.

Khandorin 1979 – Khandorin P. V. Tomsk and Tomsk citizens at the beginning of the century. Sketches of the city and events, life and customs based on the stories of old people and eyewitnesses, personal memories and memorable anecdotes. Notebooks 4‒5. Autograph. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. R-1954. Reg. 1. Cas. 6. In Russian.

Krasilnikova 2012 – Krasilnikova E. I. Tomsk cemeteries as city residents’ memory places (end of 1919 ‒ first half of 1941). Tomsk State University Journal. 2012. 363. Pp. 115‒122. In Russian.

Lebedev 1995 – Lebedev L., archpriest. Patriarchal Moscow. Moscow, 1995. In Russian.

Platoshkin 2012 – Platoshkin N. N. The Five-pointed Star. History and modernity. Military Historical Journal. 2012. 7. Pp. 77‒79. In Russian.

Resolution 1875 – Resolution of the Tomsk City Council of February 21, 1875. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. 233. Reg. 2. Cas. 78. Pp. 5‒10. In Russian.

Resolution 1905 – Resolution of the Tomsk City Duma, 1905. The State Archive of the Tomsk region. F. 233. Reg. 2. Cas. 78. P. 4. In Russian.

Savin, Teplyakov 2021 – Savin A. I., Teplyakov A. G. “Red Funeral”. New funeral rites in early Soviet Russia. Ideas and Ideals. 2021. Vol. 13. 3. Part 1. Pp. 205‒228. In Russian.

Sazonova, Maslich 2022 – Sazonova N. I., Maslich E. A. Visual sources on the history of St. John the Baptist Convent in Tomsk: Historical memory and urban myths. Journal of Visual Theology. 2022. Vol. 4. 1. Pp. 111‒128. In Russian.

Saitov 1912 – Saitov V. I. The St. Petersburg necropolis. St. Petersburg, 1912. In Russian.

Saladin 1997 – Saladin A. T. Essays on the history of Moscow cemeteries. Moscow, 1997. In Russian.

Schmidt 1991 – Schmidt S. O. The historical necropolis in the Russian cultural system. Moscow Necropolis: History, Archeology, Art, Protection. Moscow, 1991. Is. 1. Pp. 8‒23. In Russian.

Shemyakin 1917 – Shemyakin I. N. Pskov necropolis. Collection of the Pskov Provincial Scientific Archival Commission. Is. 1. Pskov, 1917. Pp. 171‒201. In Russian.

Shilov 2010 – Tomsk necropolis according to the documents of the Grand Duke Nikolai Mikhailovich Foundation in the Russian State Historical Archive / comp. According to J. N. Shilov. St. Petersburg, 2010. In Russian.

Siberian Herald 1902 – About Orthodox cemeteries in Tomsk. Siberian Herald. 1902. February 26. P. 3. In Russian.

Slavnin 1991 – Slavnin V. D. Tomsk the hidden. Tomsk, 1991. In Russian.

About author

Natalia I. Sazonova
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Cand. Sci. (Historical Sciences),
Associate Professor,
Head of the Department of Russian History and
Methods of Teaching History and Social Studies
Tomsk State Pedagogical University
60, Kievskaya ul., Tomsk, 634061, Russian Federation
Professor
Tomsk State University of Control Systems and Radioelectronics
146, Krasnoarmeyskaya St., Tomsk, 634045, Russian Federation
E-mail: nataly-sib@mail.ru

For citation:
Sazonova N. I. On the history of Orthodox cemeteries in Tomsk at the turn of the 19th ‒ 20th centuries: Visual images of funeral culture at the turning point of epochs. Journal of Visual Theology. 2026. Vol. 8. 1. Pp. 34–52. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-34-52

Published
2026-06-22
How to Cite
Sazonova, N. I. (2026). On the history of Orthodox cemeteries in Tomsk at the turn of the 19th ‒ 20th centuries: Visual images of funeral culture at the turning point of epochs. Journal of Visual Theology, 8(1), 34–52. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/178
Section
Articles
Views
0
Downloads
0