Typus-Casa Horne: connection with orthodox images and representation of theological narrative in works by Italian artists of 12th‒16th centuries

Abstract

The iconography of the Pietà is traditionally rooted back to the Vesperbild. Such an approach is not entirely correct. Panofsky proposes two types of the Italian Pietà: Pietà-Nordica which is a Mary-centered composition (iconographically indeed referring to its Northern European prototype) and a Christ-centered scheme. The latter one is called Casa-Horne-Typus by Panofsky naming it after its prototype – an image of “Cristo in Pietà” from the Horne Museum in Florence reproducing a Gregorian type of the “Man of Sorrow” to which the 13th century artist added the figure of the Virgin depicting it aside the Savior. According to Panofsky, this image testifies the transition stage from a pure symbolism of an icon to the Andachtsbild, consisting of two components (so called “forms”) “representation” and “scene narrative”. In the 12th century Byzantine Art and Old Russian Art, two formulas transmit the theological narrative of Christ’s Sacrifice, His Death and Resurrection. “Lamentation over the Dead Christ” (interpreted also as a “Suspension on the way” from the Cross – to the Tomb) and “Dead Christ in the Tomb” (associated with the Gregorian type of “Man of Sorrows”, sometimes referred to as an imago pietatis). The theological nucleus of “Lamentation” deriving from the Mirozhsky Monastary (Pskov) dated 1130s–1140s consists of two figures: Dead Christ embraced by the Mother of God. A traditional gesture from “Glikophilousa” (“Sweet-Kissing”: the cheek of the Virgin touches the cheek of the Son) takes place but in contrast to the Orthodox icon the Mother’s cheek touches the cheek of the Dead Christ and not the Child’s. Reduction of the composition to its theological nucleus turned ninety degrees clockwise so that the figures are presented vertically leads to an icon titled “Do not lament Me, O Mother” (referring to the 8th century hagiographical text written by Cosmas of Maium). The same Mirozh’s scheme reproduces the author of the image from the Horne Museum in Florence. This article aims to update Panofsky’s theory on the origin of the Christ-centered type of Italian Pietà as well as to prove the necessity to substitute the term of Typus-Casa Horne with the one of Typus-Mirozh. The author of the article proposes a new formula of the type and based on the examples of visual antithesis in the masterpieces by the Italian artists (such as Giovanni da Milano, Giovanni Bellini, Michelangelo Buonarroti) proves that two schemes were used to transmit different theological narratives. Pietà Nordica, deriving from a Mary-centered Northern European Vesperbild aims believers to associate their spiritual fillings with the sufferings of the Mother of God, whereas a Christ-centered Typus-Mirozh images are to transmit the theological ideas of Sacrifice and Resurrection.

Author Biography

E. V. Iakovleva, Russian State University for the Humanities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-2-206-227

Ekaterina V. Iakovleva
Russian State University for the Humanities,
Moscow, Russia
iakovleva.ek.vl@gmail.com
ORCID
: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1314-1601

Abstract
The iconography of the Pietà is traditionally rooted back
to the Vesperbild. Such an approach is not entirely correct.
Panofsky proposes two types of the Italian Pietà: Pietà-Nordica which is a Mary-centered composition (iconographically indeed referring to its Northern European prototype) and a Christ-centered scheme. The latter one is called Casa-Horne-Typus by Panofsky naming it after its prototype – an image of “Cristo in Pietà” from
the Horne Museum in Florence reproducing a Gregorian type of
the “Man of Sorrow” to which the 13th century artist added the figure of the Virgin depicting it aside the Savior. According to Panofsky,
this image testifies the transition stage from a pure symbolism
of an icon to the Andachtsbild, consisting of two components
(so called “forms”) “representation” and “scene narrative”.
In the 12th century Byzantine Art and Old Russian Art, two formulas transmit the theological narrative of Christ’s Sacrifice, His Death
and Resurrection. “Lamentation over the Dead Christ” (interpreted also as a “Suspension on the way” from the Cross – to the Tomb)
and “Dead Christ in the Tomb” (associated with the Gregorian type
of “Man of Sorrows”, sometimes referred to as an imago pietatis). The theological nucleus of “Lamentation” deriving from
the Mirozhsky Monastary (Pskov) dated 1130s–1140s consists of two figures: Dead Christ embraced by the Mother of God. A traditional gesture from “Glikophilousa” (“Sweet-Kissing”: the cheek of
the Virgin touches the cheek of the Son) takes place but in contrast to the Orthodox icon the Mother’s cheek touches the cheek
of the Dead Christ and not the Child’s. Reduction of the composition to its theological nucleus turned ninety degrees clockwise so that the figures are presented vertically leads to an icon titled “Do not lament Me, O Mother” (referring to the 8th century hagiographical text written by Cosmas of Maium). The same Mirozh’s scheme reproduces the author of the image from the Horne Museum in Florence. This article aims to update Panofsky’s theory on the origin of the Christ-centered type of Italian Pietà as well as to prove
the necessity to substitute the term of Typus-Casa Horne with
the one of Typus-Mirozh. The author of the article proposes a new formula of the type and based on the examples of visual antithesis in the masterpieces by the Italian artists (such as Giovanni da Milano, Giovanni Bellini, Michelangelo Buonarroti) proves that
two schemes were used to transmit different theological narratives. Pietà Nordica, deriving from a Mary-centered Northern European Vesperbild aims believers to associate their spiritual fillings with
the sufferings of the Mother of God, whereas a Christ-centered Typus-Mirozh images are to transmit the theological ideas of Sacrifice and Resurrection.

Keywords: Typus-Casa Horne, Typus-Mirozh, Andachtsbild, Vesperbild, Pietà, imago pietatis, iconography, iconology,
theory of types, visual representation

References

Belting 1980 – Belting H. An image and its function in the liturgy:
The Man of Sorrows in Byzantium. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 1980. Vol. 34/35. Pp. 1–28.

Belting 1996 – Belting H. Giovanni Bellini. La Pietà. Modena, 1996.

Belting 2002 – Belting H. Bild und Kult. Eine Geschichte des Bildes vor dem Zeitalter der Kunst. Transl. into Russian by K. Piganovich. Moscow, 2002.

Gamba 1961 – Gamba C. Il Museo Horne a Firenze. Catalogo con
40 illustrazioni. Firenze, 1961.

Garrison 1949 – Garrison E. Italian Romanesque panel painting.
An illustrated index. Florence, 1949.

Kristof 1989 – Kristof J. Michelangelo as Nicodemus: The Florence Pieta. The Sixteenth Century Journal. 1989. Vol. 20. 2. Pp. 163–182.

Lazarev 2000 – Lazarev V. N. Old Russian art. Mosaics and frescoes. Moscow, 2000. In Russian.

Maguire 1977 – Maguire H. The depiction of sorrow in Middle Byzantine art. Dumbarton Oaks Papers. 1977. Vol. 31. Pp. 122–174.

Mazzotta et al. 2018 – Mazzotta A., Salsi C., Allegri A., Mori G. Vesperbild. Alle origini delle Pietà di Michelangelo. Milan, 2018.

Nagel 1996 – Nagel A. Observations on Michelangelo’s Late Pietà drawings and sculptures. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 1996. Vol. 59. Pp. 548–572.

Nardinocchi 2011 – Nardinocchi E. Museo Horne. Guida alla visita
del museo. Firenze, 2011.

Ovcharova 2020 – Ovcharova O. V. Nerezi’s frescoes (1164)
and 12th-century Byzantine Art. Moscow, 2020. In Russian.

Panofsky 2015 – Panofsky E. Imago pietatis. Un contributo alla storia tipologica dell’Uomo dei doloiri e della Maria Mediatrix (1927),
con una nota di J. Cooke. Annali di cricica d’arte. 2015. XI. Pp. 9–74.

Panofsky 1927 – Panofsky E. “Imago Pietatis” – ein Beitrag zur Typengeschichte des Schmerzensmann und der “Maria Mediatrix”. Festschrift für Max J. Friedländer zum 60. Geburtstage. Leipzig, 1927. Pp. 261–308.

Paolucci 1997 – Paolucci A. Michelangelo. Le tre Pietà. Milano, 1997.

Pivovarova 2017 – Pivovarova N. V. Do not lament Me, O Mother. Orthodox Encyclopedia. Vol. 48. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 479–482.
In Russian.

Pivovarova 2020 – Pivovarova N. V. Entombment. Orthodox Encyclopedia. Vol. 57. Moscow, 2020. Pp. 169–173. In Russian.

Réau 1955–1956 – Réau L. Iconographie de I’art chretien. Vol. 1.
Paris, 1955–1956.

Shalina 2002 – Shalina I. A. Icon “Christ in the Tomb” and Mandylion on the Constantinople’s Epitaphios. Scientific and theological aspects of the Shroud of Turin and miraculous signs, happening
in the Orthodoxy
. Materials of the Conference. Jan. 30, 2002. URL: https://www.pravoslavie.ru/sretmon/turin/hristosvogrobe.htm.
In Russian.

Schiller 1972 – Schiller G. Iconography of Christian art. Vol. 2.
The passion of Jesus Christ. London, 1972.

Tolnay 1960 – Tolnay Ch de. Michelangelo. Vol. 5: The final period. Princeton University Press, 1960

Verdon 2006 – Verdon T. Michelangelo e il Corpo di Cristo:
Il significato religioso della Pietà di Firenze. Wasserman J. La Pietà
di Michelangelo a Firenze
. Firenze, 2006. Pp. 143–163.

Wasserman 2006 – Wasserman J. La Pietà di Michelangelo a Firenze. Firenze, 2006.

Yazykova 1995 – Yazykova I. K. Theology of icon. Moscow, 1995.
In Russian.

About author

Ekaterina V. Iakovleva
PhD Applicant (Art History)
Russian State University for the Humanities
6, Miusskaya Square, Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
E-mail: iakovleva.ek.vl@gmail.com

For citation:
Iakovleva E. V. Typus-Casa Horne: connection with orthodox images and representation of theological narrative in works by Italian artists of 12th ‒ 16th centuries. Journal of Visual Theology. 2025.
Vol. 7. 2. Pp. 206–227. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-2-206-227

Published
2025-11-20
How to Cite
Iakovleva, E. V. (2025). Typus-Casa Horne: connection with orthodox images and representation of theological narrative in works by Italian artists of 12th‒16th centuries. Visual Theology, 7(2), 206–227. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/158
Section
Articles
Views
93
Downloads
34