Religious Ideas and Medieval Legal Proceedings. A Few Remarks on the Iconographic Turn in the History of Law

Keywords: Middle Ages, iconic turn, history of law, French legal codes, miniatures, medieval religious ideas, canon law, theology, hagiography

Abstract

The article explores legal medieval iconography in its inextricable connection with the religious ideas of the time and ecclesiastical settings reflected in the canon law, theology, and hagiography. The first steps in this direction were taken only in the beginning of the 21st century, even though the iconic turn in historical research has been discussed for decades. Nevertheless, recent publications on legal medieval iconography still come from the pen of art historians, philologists, or literary critics, but not legal historians. As a result, the analysis of the content of these images is often replaced by mere descriptions. The author offers quite a different approach. Instead of studying miniatures and marginalia only as illustrations to the text to which they are formally attached, she attempts to relate the content of these images with medieval religious ideas. Such a turn of study necessitates references to ecclesiastical texts, and in each individual case, as the author accentuates, it requires a distinctly specific source. Thus, the analysis of the miniature from the “Coutumes de Toulouse” (end of the 13th c.) requires the reference to the Decretum of Gratian and the Liber sextus of Boniface VIII, according to which the artist interpreted the degradation of clerics. The marginalia from the “Coutumes de Bordeaux” (1438), which illustrates the death sentence imposed on thieves, recalls the doctrine of atonement developed by Anselm of Canterbury. The image of the Virgin Mary in the scene of fox Renard’s hanging from the Smithfield decretals (second half of the 14th c.) refers to the ideas of the parasudic procedure liberatus a suspendio, repeatedly described in Marian hagiography. The treatise of French theologian Jean Gerson Requête pour les condamnés à mort” (end of the 14th c.) should be considered as a starting point for changing the iconography of the death penalty in the next century. In general, as the author concludes, the comparison of medieval legal images with the works of canonists, theologians and hagiographic writings allows not only to understand the deeper meaning inherent in miniatures, but also to clarify the dating of manuscripts, the principles of the artists’ work and their relations with clients.

Author Biography

O. I. Togoeva , Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2024-6-1-37-57

Olga I. Togoeva
Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences,
Moscow, Russia
togoeva@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7854-3222

Abstract
The article explores legal medieval iconography in its inextricable connection with the religious ideas of the time and ecclesiastical settings reflected in the canon law, theology, and hagiography.
The first steps in this direction were taken only in the beginning of the 21st century, even though the iconic turn in historical research has been discussed for decades. Nevertheless, recent publications on legal medieval iconography still come from the pen of art historians, philologists, or literary critics, but not legal historians.
As a result, the analysis of the content of these images is often replaced by mere descriptions. The author offers quite a different approach. Instead of studying miniatures and marginalia only as illustrations to the text to which they are formally attached, she attempts to relate the content of these images with medieval religious ideas. Such a turn of study necessitates references to ecclesiastical texts, and in each individual case, as the author accentuates, it requires a distinctly specific source. Thus,
the analysis of the miniature from the “Coutumes de Toulouse” (end of the 13th c.) requires the reference to the Decretum of Gratian and
the Liber sextus of Boniface VIII, according to which the artist interpreted the degradation of clerics. The marginalia from the “Coutumes de Bordeaux” (1438), which illustrates the death sentence imposed on thieves, recalls the doctrine of atonement developed by Anselm of Canterbury. The image of the Virgin Mary in the scene of fox Renard’s hanging from the Smithfield decretals (second half of the 14th c.) refers to the ideas of the parasudic procedure liberatus
a suspendio,
repeatedly described in Marian hagiography. The treatise of French theologian Jean Gerson Requête pour les condamnés à mort” (end of the 14th c.) should be considered as a starting point for changing the iconography of the death penalty in the next century. In general, as the author concludes, the comparison of medieval legal images with the works of canonists, theologians and hagiographic writings allows not only to understand the deeper meaning inherent in miniatures, but also to clarify the dating of manuscripts, the principles of the artists’ work and their relations with clients.

Keywords: Middle Ages, iconic turn, history of law, French legal codes, miniatures, medieval religious ideas, canon law, theology, hagiography

References

Akehurst 2010 – The Costuma d’Agen. A Thirteenth-Century Customary Compilation in old Occitan Transcribed from the Livre juratore. Ed., transl. by F. R. P. Akehurst. Turnhout, 2010.

Berman 1994 – Berman H. J. Law and Revolution. The Formation of the Western Legal Tradition. Transl. into Russian by N. R. Nikonova. Moscow, 1994.

Bilotta 2009 – Bilotta M. A. Images dans les marges des manuscrits toulousains de la première moitié du XIVe siècle : un monde imaginé entre invention et réalité. Mélanges de l’École française de Rome – Moyen Âge. 2009. 121 (2). Pp. 349–359.

Bilotta 2011 – Bilotta M. A. I Libri dei papi. La Curia, il Laterano e la produzione manoscritta ad uso del papato nel Medioevo
(secoli VI–XIII). Città del Vaticano, 2011.

Bilotta 2012 – Bilotta M. A. Bologne et ses liens avec Avignon: manuscrits juridiques et liturgiques. Le Pontifical d’Autun. Chef-d’œuvre inconnu du premier Trecento (1330–1340). Ed. par F. Avril,
B. Maurice-Chabard, M. Medica. Langres, 2012. Pp. 260–277.

Bilotta 2014 – Bilotta M. A. Coesistenza e cooperazione nel Sud della Francia fra XIII e XIV secolo: il caso di alcuni manoscritti giuridici miniati ad Avignone. Coexistence et cooperation in the Middle Ages. A cura di A. Musco e G. Musotto. Palermo, 2014. Рp. 213–247.

Bilotta 2021 – Medieval Europe in Motion 3. The Circulation of Jurists, Legal Manuscripts and Artistic, Cultural and Legal Practices in Medieval Europe (13th – 15th centuries). Ed. by M. A. Bilotta. Palermo, 2021.

Bilotta, del Monaco 2023 – Imago, ius, religio. Religious Iconographies in Illustrated Legal Manuscripts and Printed Books (9th–20th Centuries). Ed. by M. A. Bilotta and G. del Monaco. Eikón / Imago. 2023. Vol. 12.

Royal Ms. 10 E IV – Smithfield Decretals. British Library. Royal Ms. 10 E IV.

BNF. Ms. fr. 2646 – Jean Froissart. Chroniques. Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Ms. fr. 2646.

BNF. Ms. fr. 5361 – Coutumes de Bordeaux. Bibliothèque Nationale
de France
. Ms. fr. 5361.

BNF. Ms. lat. 9187 – Coutumes de Toulouse. Bibliothèque Nationale de France. Ms. lat. 9187.

Böhm 1994 – Böhm G. Wiederkehr der Bilder. Was ist ein Bild.
Hrsg. von G. Böhm. München, 1994. Ss. 11–38.

Brown-Grant 2020 – Brown-Grant R. Visualizing Justice in Burgundian Prose Romance. Text and Image in Manuscripts of the Wavrin Master (1450s–1460s). Turnhout, 2020.

Brunn 2018 – Brunn U. Dialectique, dualité christologique et monisme institutionnel. La construction d’un monde sans division… avec les « manichéens » en marge (de Grégoire VII à Innocent III). Aux marges de l’hérésie. Inventions, formes et usages polémiques de l’accusation d’hérésie au Moyen Âge. Sous la dir. de F. Mercier et I. Rosé. Rennes, 2018. Pp. 85–110.

Caesarius 1937 – Die Wundergeschichten des Caesarius von Heisterbach. Bd. III. Hrsg. von A. Hilka. Bonn, 1937.

Carbasse 1974 – Carbasse J.-M. Consulats méridionaux et justice criminelle. Montpellier, 1974.

Caviness, Nelson 2018 – Caviness M. H., Nelson Ch. G. Women and Jews in the Sachsenspiegel Picture-Books. Turnhout, 2018.

Chiffoleau 1990 – Chiffoleau J. Dire l’indicible. Remarques sur la cathégorie du nefandum du XIIe au XVe siècle. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales. 1990. Vol. 45 (2). Рp. 289–324.

Chirkova 2010 – Chirkova A. V. Documents of the Papal Chancellery of the XI – Beginning of the XIV Century in the Collections of
St. Petersburg: Identification, Source Analysis. Dissertation for the degree of candidate of historical sciences. St. Petersburg, 2010. In Russian.

Chirkova 2016 – Chirkova A. V. Clerical Marks in the Documents of the Apostolic Chancellery of the XIII – early XIV century (based on the materials of the St. Petersburg collections). Auxiliary Historical Disciplines. Is. 35. St. Petersburg, 2016. Pp. 316–358. In Russian.

Denis-Morel 2015 – Denis-Morel B. Passing Sentence: Variations on the Figure of the Judge in French Political, Legal, and Historical Texts from the Thirteenth to the Fifteenth Century. Textual and Visual Representations of Power and Justice in Medieval France: Manuscripts and Early Printed Books. Ed. by R. Brown-Grant, A. D. Hedeman, B. Ribémont. Farnham, Burlington, 2015. Pp. 151–170.

Fleckner et al. 2011 – Handbuch der politischen Ikonographie.
Hrsg. von U. Fleckner, M. Warnke, H. Ziegler. Bd. 1: Abdankung bis Huldigung. Bd. 2: Imperator bis Zwerg. München, 2011.

Friedberg 1955 a – Decretum magistri Gratiani. Corpus Iuris Canonici. Bd. 1. Hrsg. von A. Friedberg. Graz, 1955.

Friedberg 1955 b – Liber sextus. Decretalium d. Bonifacii papae VIII. Corpus Iuris Canonici. Bd. 2. Hrsg. von A. Friedberg. Graz, 1955.

Gaiffier 1943 – Gaiffier B. de. Un thème hagiographique : le pendu miraculeusement sauvé. Revue belge d’archéologie et d’histoire de l’art. 1943. Vol. 13. Pp. 123–148.

Gaiffier 1953 – Gaiffier B. de. Liberatus a suspendio : à propos d’un thème hagiographique. Mélanges de linguistique et de littérature romanes offerts à Mario Roques. Pt. 2. Paris, 1953. Pp. 93–97.

Gauvard 2018 – Gauvard C. Condamner à mort au Moyen Âge : Pratiques de la peine capitale en France XIIIe–XVe siècle. Paris, 2018.

Gerson 1967 – Gerson J. Requete pour les condamnés à mort. Gerson J. Oeuvres complètes. Vol. 7. Ed. par P. Glorieux. Paris, 1967. Pp. 341–343.

Gilles 1969 – Gilles H. Les coutumes de Toulouse (1286) et leur premier commentaire (1296). Toulouse, 1969.

Harries 2010 – Harries J. Law and Crime in the Roman World. Cambridge, 2010.

Inishev 2012 – Inishev I. N. “Iconic Turn” in Theories of Culture and Society. Logos. 2012. 1 (85). Pp. 184–211. In Russian.

Kazbekova 2023 a – Kazbekova E. V. Student, Master or Scribe? Criteria of Definition and Their Practical Application Based on the Material of the List of “Compilatio Prima” by Bernardo of Pavia in the Bamberg Manuscript. Can. 19. Istoriya. 2023. Vol. 14. Is. 6 (128). URL: https://history.jes.su/s207987840025792-0-1/. In Russian.

Kazbekova 2023 b – Kazbekova E. V. On the Importance of Marginalia. Srednie Veka. Studies on Medieval and Early Modern History. 2023. Vol. 84 (4). Pp. 190–203. In Russian.

Koopmans 2000 – Koopmans J. Le pendu miraculeusement sauvé : littérature et faits divers. Rapports : Het Franse boek. 2000. Vol. 70. Pp. 130–138.

Koretsky 1985 – Saxon Mirror. Monument, Comments, Research.
Ed. by V. M. Koretsky. Moscow, 1985. In Russian.

L’Engle 2002 – L’Engle S. Justice in the Margins: Punishment in Medieval Toulouse. Viator. 2002. Vol. 33. Pp. 133–165.

L’Engle, Gibbs 2001 – L’Engle S., Gibbs R. Illuminating the Law:
Legal Manuscripts in Cambridge Collections. London, 2001.

Maizuls 2022 – Maizuls M. R. An Imaginary Enemy. Gentiles in Medieval Iconography. Moscow, 2022. In Russian.

Mitchell 1994 – Mitchell W. J. T. The Pictorial Turn. Mitchell W. J. T. Picture Theory. Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, London, 1994. Рp. 11–34.

Morel 2007 – Morel B. Une iconographie de la répression judiciaire. Le châtiment dans l’enluminure en France du XIIIe au XVe siècle. Paris, 2007.

Ordonnances 1750 – Ordonnances des roys de France de la troisième race. Vol. 8. Paris, 1750.

Rassner 1998 – The Institutions of Justinian. Transl. into Russian by D. Rassner. Moscow, 1998.

Schimmelpfennig 1984 – Schimmelpfennig B. Degradation of Clerics. Dictionary of the Middles Ages. Vol. 4. New York, 1984. Pp. 133–134.

Schmidt 1984 – Schmidt G. “Belehrender” und “befreinder” Humor: Ein Versuch über die Funktionen des Komischen in der bildenden Kunst des Mittelalters. Worüber Lacht das Publikum im Theater? Spass und betroffenheit Einst und Heute. Festschrift zum 90. Geburtstag von Heinz Kindermann. Hrsg. von M. Dietrich. Wien, 1984. Ss. 9–39.

Schmidt-Wiegand 1993 а – Schmidt-Wiegand R. Die Wolfenbütteler Bilderhandschrift des Sachsenspiegels. Aufsätze und Untersuchungen. Kommentarband zur Faksimile-Ausgabe. Berlin, 1993.

Schmidt-Wiegand 1993 b – Schmidt-Wiegand R. Die Oldenburger Bilderhandschrift des Sachsenspiegels. Berlin, 1993.

Schmidt-Wiegand 2008 – Schmidt-Wiegand R. Handwörterbuch zur deutschen Rechtsgeschichte. Berlin, 2008.

Sidorov 2020 – Sidorov A. I. Review of: Marginalien in Bild und Text. Essays zu mittelalterlichen Handschriften. Hrsg. von P. Carmassi und Ch. Heitzmann. Wiesbaden, 2019. Srednie Veka. Studies on Medieval and Early Modern History. 2020. Vol. 81 (2). Pp. 215–228. In Russian.

Togoeva 2017 – Togoeva O. I. Liberatus a suspendio: Judicial Practice vs. Literary Plot. Casus. Individual and Unique in History – 2017. Is. 12. Ed. by O. I. Togoeva and I. N. Danilevsky. Moscow, 2017. Pp. 169–184.
In Russian.

Togoeva 2018 – Togoeva O. I. Roman Criminal Law in the “Coutumes of Toulouse” (BNF. Ms. lat. 9187): A Memory of the Past or an Attempt of Codification? The Phenomenon of Unification in History. Ed. by E. N. Kirillova. Moscow, 2019. Pp. 106–124. In Russian.

Togoeva 2021 – Togoeva O. I. The Crucifixion from the Parliament of Paris (1448), Its Political and Legal Meanings. RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. “Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies” Series. 2021. 5.
Pp. 93–113. In Russian.

Togoeva 2022 – Togoeva O. I. “The Veritable Truth”. The Languages of Medieval Justice. Moscow, 2022. In Russian.

Togoeva 2023 – Togoeva O. I. Omission as a Description: On the Concept of nefandum in Medieval Texts. Omission. Interpretation of Cultural Codes – 2023. Ed. by V. Y. Mikhailin. Saratov, 2023. Рp. 3–11.
In Russian.

Trivellone 2009 – Trivellone A. L’hérétique imaginé. Hétérodoxie et iconographie dans l’Occident médiéval, de l’époque carolingienne à l’Inquisition. Turnhout, 2009.

Trivellone 2017 – Trivellone A. Le Mont-Cassin, une fabrique de l’hérésie au XIe siècle. Aux marges de l’hérésie. Inventions, formes et usages polémiques de l’accusation d’hérésie au Moyen Âge. Sous la dir. de F. Mercier et I. Rosé. Rennes, 2017. Pp. 239–273.

Varty 1963 – Varty K. Reynard the Fox and the Smithfield Decretals. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 1963. Vol. 26. Pp. 347–354.

Voskoboynikov 2022 – Voskoboynikov O. S. 16 Essays on Art. Moscow, 2022. In Russian.

About author

Olga I. Togoeva
Dr. Sci. (History), Chief Research Fellow
Institute of World History of the Russian Academy of Sciences
32a, Leninsky prospect, Moscow, 119334, Russian Federation
E-mail: togoeva@yandex.ru

For citation:
Togoeva O. I. Religious ideas and medieval legal proceedings. A few remarks on the iconographic turn in the history of law. Journal of Visual Theology. 2024. Vol. 6. 1. Pp. 37–57. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2024-6-1-37-57

Published
2024-06-26
Section
Articles
Views
49
Downloads
11