Discussion about authenticity of Loreto’s Sacred Space in the notes of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky

Keywords: Santuario della Santa Casa, Mariazell, Loreto, Nazareth, Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky, pilgrimage notes, church archeology, relics

Abstract

The article analyzes three fragments from the travel notes of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky about pilgrimage sites identified as the house of the Virgin Mary in Mariazell, Loreto and Nazareth. This traveler, who lived in the 18th century, was an Orthodox Christian and his education was very close to European University tradition, was interested not only in the appearance and history of these complexes, but also in the authenticity of the objects of worship. The texts about Mariazell and Loreto are non-critical descriptions, although about the shrine in Nazareth in his description Barsky is doubting about the authenticity of what he had seen earlier. Bringing scientific arguments, he is convinced of the falsity of the Catholic shrine in Loreto and the falsity of the legend about moving the house to another location. His reasoning, at first glance, is a natural part of interfaith polemics, but when referring to the tradition of Loretan criticism, it turns out that the author is included in the polemic that began in European religious and scientific circles long before him. His arguments are of interest from the point of view of the history of the Church, since he refutes Catholic practice, relying on arguments of a scientific nature, and not on theology.

Author Biography

Yu. N. Buzykina , Moscow Kremlin Museums

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2023-5-1-78-92

Yulia N. Buzykina
Moscow Kremlin Museums, Moscow, Russia
yuliabuzykina@kremlin.museum.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3744-269X

Abstract
The article analyzes three fragments from the travel notes of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky about pilgrimage sites identified as the house of the Virgin Mary in Mariazell, Loreto and Nazareth. This traveler, who lived in the 18th century, was an Orthodox Christian and his education was very close to European University tradition, was interested not only in the appearance and history of these complexes, but also in the authenticity of the objects of worship. The texts about Mariazell and Loreto are non-critical descriptions, although about the shrine in Nazareth in his description Barsky is doubting about the authenticity of what he had seen earlier. Bringing scientific arguments, he is convinced of the falsity of the Catholic shrine in Loreto and the falsity of the legend about moving the house to another location. His reasoning, at first glance, is a natural part of interfaith polemics, but when referring to the tradition of Loretan criticism, it turns out that the author is included in the polemic that began in European religious and scientific circles long before him. His arguments are of interest from the point of view of the history of the Church, since he refutes Catholic practice, relying on arguments of a scientific nature, and not on theology.

Keywords: Santuario della Santa Casa, Mariazell, Loreto, Nazareth, Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky, pilgrimage notes, church archeology, relics

References

Buzykina 2020 – Buzykina Yu. N. Reviewing the Sacred Object. Vassiliy Barskiy as the First Russian Researcher of the Christian East. Russian Journal of Church History. 2020. 1 (1). Pp. 13–21.
In Russian.

Buzykina 2022 a – Buzykina Yu. N. Byzantine Icons and Other Sacred Images in the Travel Notes of Grigorovich-Barskiy. Actual Problems of Theory and History of Art. Vol. 12. St. Petersburg, 2022. Pp. 148–166. In Russian.

Buzykina 2022 b – Buzykina Yu. N. Egyptian Drawings of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky and Their Possible Prototypes. Fabrica Mundi. Illustrating Scientific Ideas in the Middle Ages and Modern Times.
Ed. by E. A. Efimova. Moscow, 2022. Pp. 186–203. In Russian.

Chevalier 1906 – Notre-Dame de Lorette. Étude historique sur l’authenticité de la Santa Casa, par le chanoine Ulysse Chevalier, correspondant de l’Institut. Paris, 1906.

Grigorovich-Barsky 1885 – Wanderings of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky through the Holy Places of the East from 1723 to 1747. Part 1.
St. Petersburg, 1885. In Russian.

Grigorovich-Barsky 1886 – Wanderings of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky through the Holy Places of the East from 1723 to 1747. Part 2.
St. Petersburg, 1886. In Russian.

Lidov 2009 – New Jerusalems: Hierotopy and iconography of sacred spaces. Ed. by A. M. Lidov. Moscow, 2009. In Russian.

Misson 1691 – Misson F. M. Nouveau voyage d’Italie, fait en l’année 1688, avec un mémoire contenant des avis utiles à ceux qui voudront faire le mesme voyage. Vol. 2. La Haye, 1691.

Naud 1702 – Naud R. P. Voyage nouveau de la Terre-Sainte, enrichi de plusieurs remarques particulières qui servent à l’intelligence de la Sainte Ecriture. Paris, 1702.

Prokhorov 1997 – Life and Pilgrimage of Abbot Daniel from Russian Land. Ed. by G. M. Prokhorov. Library of Literature of Old Rus’. Vol. 4. St. Petersburg, 1997. Pp. 26–117. In Russian.

Roger 1664 – La Terre Sainte, ou description topographique tres-particuliere des saints Lieux, & de la Terre de Promission par
F. Eugène Roger. Paris, 1664.

Thurston 1912 – Thurston H. Santa Casa di Loreto. The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 13. New York, 1912.
URL: http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/13454b.htm.

About author

Yulia N. Buzykina
Cand. Sci. (Art History), Senior Researcher
Moscow Kremlin Museums
Kremlin, Moscow, 103132, Russian Federation
E-mail: yuliabuzykina@kremlin.museum.ru

For citation:
Buzykina Yu. N. Discussion about authenticity of Loreto’s Sacred Space in the notes of Vasily Grigorovich-Barsky. Journal of Visual Theology. 2023. Vol. 5. 1. Pp. 78–92.
https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2023-5-1-78-92

Published
2023-06-28
Section
Articles
Views
3120
Downloads
67