Recontextualizing hadith on image prohibition to assess AI-generated images through Fazlur Rahman’s double movement
Abstract
The rapid development of AI image generation technology has produced more than 60 % of digital visual content circulating online, yet Islamic jurisprudence has not provided contextual legal responses to this phenomenon. Traditional hadith-based prohibitions on depicting sentient beings face conceptual challenges when applied to AI-generated images, which are not created by human hands and lack intentionality, agency, or moral capacity. This article explores the legal status of AI-generated images using Fazlur Rahman’s double movement hermeneutics to re-read the hadith corpus concerning image-making. Employing a normative-qualitative method and intertextual analysis, the study finds that AI cannot be classified as a legal subject (mukallaf) in Islamic law. Thus, legal responsibility lies entirely with the human user (prompt engineer), evaluated through the lenses of intention (niyyah), content, and social implications. The study offers a conceptual framework for Islamic legal judgment that aligns with the maqāṣid al-sharī’ah and ethical integrity while addressing the ontological shifts in representational media.
