Sergei Parajanov: Religious functions of his image (using the example of collages and photographs)

Keywords: visual presentation, quasi-icon, game, Christian values, Sergei Parajanov, carnival

Abstract

In the light of Christian values, the article examines Parajanov’s tendency to undermine creative canons. The article’s empirical material consists of his assemblages, collages, and photographs. The article describes the picture director’s inner world and various psychological states based on visual materials. His work serves as an indication of his playful nature and the artifacts of his deliberate and unintentional disruption of traditions, genre canons, and cinematic language. Like his predecessors, the Armenian “troubadour” Sayat-Nova (18th century) and the French poet Francois Villon (15th century), who lived on the cultural boundary of critical epochs, Parajanov, as a “man of the frontier”, eliminates all cultural boundaries. The article’s central argument is that Christian symbols and artifacts serve different purposes and are seen differently depending on the author’s mood on the following oppositions: game versus non-game, jail versus civil life, and death versus life. As demonstrated by the examination of the empirical data, Parajanov plays the roles of Parajanov-Christ, Parajanov-God, and Parajanov as the head of the Armenian Apostolic Church (Catholicos). Since his mind is unable to distinguish between reality and mise-en-scène, spectator and stage, his images are the result of carnivalesque thinking. He destroys all conventional behavioral frames. The analysis shows that there is no contact with demonism in his playful behavior. His Christian hypotheses serve as metaphors for cultural domination. The intertextual nature of Parajanov’s play involved the recoding and replaying of primary texts (Armenian miniature, Michelangelo’s work). Since the codes to meanings are outside of the text rather than inside it, the game becomes an intellectual one, adding complexity and uniqueness to his work.

Author Biography

T. S. Simyan, Yerevan State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-119-132

Tigran Simyan
Yerevan State University, Yerevan, Armenia
tsimyan@ysu.am
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9534-3505

Abstract
In the light of Christian values, the article examines Parajanov’s tendency to undermine creative canons. The article’s empirical material consists of his assemblages, collages, and photographs. The article describes the picture director’s inner world and various psychological states based on visual materials. His work serves as an indication of his playful nature and the artifacts of his deliberate and unintentional disruption of traditions, genre canons, and cinematic language. Like his predecessors, the Armenian “troubadour” Sayat-Nova (18th century) and the French poet Francois Villon (15th century), who lived on the cultural boundary of critical epochs, Parajanov, as a “man of the frontier”, eliminates all cultural boundaries. The article’s central argument is that Christian symbols and artifacts serve different purposes and are seen differently depending on the author’s mood on the following oppositions: game versus non-game, jail versus civil life, and death versus life. As demonstrated by the examination of the empirical data, Parajanov plays the roles of Parajanov-Christ, Parajanov-God, and Parajanov as the head of the Armenian Apostolic Church (Catholicos). Since his mind is unable to distinguish between reality and mise-en-scène, spectator and stage, his images are the result of carnivalesque thinking. He destroys all conventional behavioral frames. The analysis shows that there is no contact with demonism in his playful behavior. His Christian hypotheses serve as metaphors for cultural domination. The intertextual nature of Parajanov’s play involved the recoding and replaying of primary texts (Armenian miniature, Michelangelo’s work). Since the codes to meanings are outside of the text rather than inside it, the game becomes an intellectual one, adding complexity and uniqueness to his work.

Keywords: visual presentation, quasi-icon, game, Christian values, Sergei Parajanov, carnival

Funding: the work was supported by the Science Committee of Republic of Armenia, in the frames of the research project no. 21AG-6C041, 24SSAH-6B014

References

Abrahamian 2012 – Abrahamian L. Sergei Parajanov and Sayat Nova. Caucasian Dictionary: Land and People. Moscow, 2012. Pp. 322–323. In Russian.

Abrahamian 2014 – Abrahamian L. A film director who looks at the world through the eyes of an artist. Kaleidoscope of Parajanov. Drawing, collage, and assemblage. Yerevan, 2014. Pp. 19–29. In Russian.

Angela 2024 – Angela G. Paris Olympics organisers apologise to Christians for unintentional Last Supper parody. The Guardian. 2024, 23 July. URL: https://www.theguardian.com/sport/article/2024/jul/28/paris-olympics-organisers-apologise-to-christians-for-last-supper-parody (accessed: 06.07.2025).

Drambian 1967Armenian miniature: Album. Ed. by R. G. Drambian. Yerevan, 1967․ In Armenian.

Hakobyan 1978 – Armenian miniature. Vaspourakan: Album. Ed. by Gr. Hakobyan. Yerevan, 1978․ In Armenian.

Henzelmann 2016Henzelmann M. Der Ausbau des Bunjewatzischen zu einer südslavischen Mikroliteratursprache. Zeitschrift für Slawistik. 2016. 61 (2). S. 353–368.

Kaftandjiev 2016 – Kaftandjiev Ch. Mythological archetypes in communication. Kharkov, 2016. In Russian.

Katanyan 1994 –KatanyanV.V. Parajanov. The price of an eternalholiday.Moscow,1994.In Russian.

Katanyan 2001 – Katanyan V. V. Parajanov. The price of an eternal holiday. Nizhny Novgorod, 2001. In Russian.

Kosikov 2002 a – Kosikov G. K. Francois Villon. Villon F. Poems. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 5–39. In Russian.

Kosikov 2002 b – Kosikov G. K. On the literary fate of Villon. Villon F. Poems. Moscow, 2002. Pp. 374–383. In Russian.

Lacan 1995 – Lacan J. The function and field of speech and language in psychoanalysis. Transl. into Russian by A. K. Chernoglazov. Moscow, 1995.

Likhachev et al. 1984 – Likhachev D. S., Panchenko A. M., Ponyrko N. V. Laugh in Old Russia. Leningrad, 1984. In Russian.

Lugovsky 1998 – Lugovsky V. Unknown maestro. Kiev, 1998. In Ukrainian.

Mechitov 2024 – Sergei Parajanov. Chronicle of the dialogue. Ed. by Yuri Mechitov. Moscow, 2024. In Russian.

Parajanov 1993 – Parajanov S. Confessions. Screenplays. 1993. 6. Pp. 8–26. In Russian.

Sargsyan et al. 2008 – Kaleidoscope of Paradjanov. Drawing, collage, and assemblage. Ed. by Z. Sargsyan, A. Harutyunyan, L. A. Abrahamian. Yerevan, 2014. In Russian.

Simyan 2019 – Simyan T. S. Sergei Parajanov as a text: Man, habitus, and interior (on the material of visual texts). ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. 2019. 3 (21). Pp. 197–215. In Russian.

Simyan 2021 – Simyan T. S. Kiev of the Soviet-Era from Parajanov’s Point of View: “Kiev Frescoes”. Urbis et Orbis. Microhistory and Semiotics of the City. 2021. 1. Pp. 119–141. In Russian.

Simyan 2022 a – Simyan T. S. Sergei Parajanov and Tiflis: “Guide” of cultural memory, urban space, and its transformation. Critique and Semiotics. 2022. 1. Pp. 198–215. In Russian.

Simyan 2022 b – Simyan T. S. The world of Hutsuls through the eyes of Sergei Parajanov: Semiotic translation, film language, existential invariants. Rusin. 2022. 67. Pp. 375–389. In Russian.

Simyan 2022 c – Simyan T. ‘Guilty of being free’: An intellectual vs. Soviet penal system (prison letters and drawings of Sergei Parajanov). Changing Societies & Personalities. 2022. 1. Pp. 197–216.

Simyan 2023 – Simyan T. S. The problem of semiotic translation: Sergei Parajanov as a mystifier and “translator” (by the example of Sergei Parajanov). Critique and Semiotics. 2023. 1. Pp. 453–468. In Russian.

Simyan 2024 – Simyan T. S. Christian values and the problem of self-presentation by Sergei Parajanov: “A Saint in prison”. Journal of Visual Theology. 2024. Vol. 6. 2. Pp. 382–397. In Russian.

Tsereteli 2008Collage on the background of a self-portrait. Life is a game. Ed. by Kora Tsereteli. Nizhny Novgorod, 2008. In Russian.

Yan 2024 – Yan Zh. An Olympics scene draws scorn. Did it really parody ‘The Last Supper’? The New York Times. 2024, 28 July. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/28/sports/olympics-opening-ceremony-last-supper-paris.html (accessed: 06.07.2025).

About author

Tigran S. Simyan
Dr. Sci. (Philology),
Head of Department of Media Studies and Semiotics
Yerevan State University
1, Alex Manoogian St., Yerevan, 0025, Armenia
E-mail: tsimyan@ysu.am

For citation:
Simyan T. S. Sergei Parajanov: Religious functions of his image (using the example of collages and photographs). Journal of Visual Theology. 2026. Vol. 8. 1. Pp. 119–132. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-119-132

Published
2026-06-22
How to Cite
Simyan, T. S. (2026). Sergei Parajanov: Religious functions of his image (using the example of collages and photographs). Journal of Visual Theology, 8(1), 119-132. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/183
Section
Articles
Views
0
Downloads
0