Icons of the material: Contemporary art, new materialisms, and visual theology

Keywords: contemporary art, new materialisms, visual theology, material agency, bioart, digital art, icon, the sacred

Abstract

This article explores the possibility of implementing iconographic principles in the mediums of contemporary art. Its central thesis is that matter in contemporary art ceases to be a passive carrier of meaning, instead becoming an active participant in the creative process. This approach finds parallels in visual theology, where the icon is understood not as a representation of the sacred but as a space of its manifestation. The philosophical foundation for this perspective lies in new materialisms, which reject the duality of matter and spirit, asserting that matter possesses its own vitality and capacity for meaning-making. The authors examine specific artistic projects (e. g., works by Angelika Mesiti, Trevor Paglen, Wolfgang Laib) that demonstrate how matter ‒ whether biological tissue, rusting metal, or algorithmic code ‒ participates in the creation of an artwork. These practices are juxtaposed with traditional iconography, where the material image is also regarded as a bearer of the divine, as well as with Pavel Florensky’s teaching on the interactive nature of created matter. The article develops a methodological approach combining three key stages of analysis. The first stage involves deconstructing the anthropocentric model of creativity through the lens of new materialisms (Jane Bennett, Karen Barad), where agency is distributed among human and non-human actors (materials, technologies, natural processes). The second stage includes the comparison with visual theology (Jean-Luc Marion, Christos Yannaras), which reinterprets the material image not as representation but as an event of encounter with the sacred. The third stage analyzes specific artistic practices through this dual framework, revealing how contemporary art replicates the logic of the icon in new media. The article pays special attention to original art projects proposed by the authors as examples of icon-making by means of contemporary art. In conclusion, the author argues for the emergence of a new paradigm in which the sacred is understood not as transcendent but as immanent property of matter. Contemporary art thus becomes a new form of iconography, where matter itself serves as a medium of Revelation.

Author Biography

A. V. Markov , Russian State University for the Humanities

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-98-118

Alexander V. Markov
Russian State University for the Humanities, Moscow, Russia
markovius@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6874-1073

Oksana A. Shtayn
Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
shtaynshtayn@gmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1701-3147

Abstract
This article explores the possibility of implementing iconographic principles in the mediums of contemporary art. Its central thesis is that matter in contemporary art ceases to be a passive carrier of meaning, instead becoming an active participant in the creative process. This approach finds parallels in visual theology, where the icon is understood not as a representation of the sacred but as a space of its manifestation. The philosophical foundation for this perspective lies in new materialisms, which reject the duality of matter and spirit, asserting that matter possesses its own vitality and capacity for meaning-making. The authors examine specific artistic projects (e. g., works by Angelika Mesiti, Trevor Paglen, Wolfgang Laib) that demonstrate how matter ‒ whether biological tissue, rusting metal, or algorithmic code ‒ participates in the creation of an artwork. These practices are juxtaposed with traditional iconography, where the material image is also regarded as a bearer of the divine, as well as with Pavel Florensky’s teaching on the interactive nature of created matter. The article develops a methodological approach combining three key stages of analysis. The first stage involves deconstructing the anthropocentric model of creativity through the lens of new materialisms (Jane Bennett, Karen Barad), where agency is distributed among human and non-human actors (materials, technologies, natural processes). The second stage includes the comparison with visual theology (Jean-Luc Marion, Christos Yannaras), which reinterprets the material image not as representation but as an event of encounter with the sacred. The third stage analyzes specific artistic practices through this dual framework, revealing how contemporary art replicates the logic of the icon in new media. The article pays special attention to original art projects proposed by the authors as examples of icon-making by means of contemporary art. In conclusion, the author argues for the emergence of a new paradigm in which the sacred is understood not as transcendent but as immanent property of matter. Contemporary art thus becomes a new form of iconography, where matter itself serves as a medium of Revelation.

Keywords: contemporary art, new materialisms, visual theology, material agency, bioart, digital art, icon, the sacred

References

Barad 1997 – Barad K. Meeting the Universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, 1997.

Barad 2012 – Barad K. Nature’s queer performativity. Kvinder, Køn & Forskning. 2012. 1–2. Pp. 25–53.

Barad 2014 – Barad K. Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax. 2014. Vol. 20. 3. Pp. 168–187.

Barad 2017 – Barad K. Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: Re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations. 2017. Vol. 92. Pp. 56–86.

Barad 2018 – Barad K. Agential realism: How material-discursive practices matter. Transl. into Russian. Experiences of Non-Human Hospitality: An Anthology. Ed. by M. Kramar, K. Sarkisov. Moscow, 2018. Pp. 42–121.

Bennett 2020 – Bennett J. Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, 2020.

Bloor 2002 – Bloor D. The strong programme in the sociology of knowledge. Transl. into Russian. Logos. 2002. 6 (35). Pp. 1–24.

Braidotti 2022 – Braidotti R. The virtual as affirmative praxis: A neo-materialist approach. Humanities. 2022. Vol. 11. 3. P. 62.

DeLanda 2021 – DeLanda M. A thousand years of nonlinear history. Princeton, 2021.

Deleuze 2004 – Deleuze G. Cinema. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2004.

Florensky 1914 – Florensky P. A. The Pillar and Ground of the Truth: An essay in Orthodox Theodicy in twelve letters. Moscow, 1914. In Russian.

Flusser 2008 – Flusser V. Towards a philosophy of photography. Transl. into Russian. St. Petersburg, 2008.

Khrenov 2017 – Khrenov N. A. The post-totalitarian period in the history of Russian cinema: Religious tradition and mass mentality. Article two. Artikult. 2017. 3 (27). Pp. 6‒18. In Russian.

Latour 1997 – Latour B. A Few steps toward an anthropology of the iconoclastic gesture. Science in Context. 1997. Vol. 10. 1. Pp. 63–83.

Latour 2014 – Latour B. How to be iconophilic in art, science, and religion? Picturing Science, Producing Art. London, 2014. Pp. 418–440.

Latour 2019 – Latour B. Where to land? An attempt at political orientation. Transl. into Russian by A. Shestakov. St. Petersburg, 2019.

Marion 2009 – Marion J.-L. The idol and distance. Transl. into Russian. Simvol (Paris). 2009. 56. Pp. 1–292.

Marion 2010 – Marion J.-L. The crossing of the visible. Transl. into Russian. Moscow, 2010.

Marion 2014 – Marion J.-L. The saturated phenomenon. Transl. into Russian. Postphenomenology: New Phenomenology in France and Beyond. Moscow, 2014. Pp. 63–99.

Morgachev 2023 – Morgachev S. V. Experience of a devotional prayer in front of an icon, reflected in the icon itself. Journal of Visual Theology. 2023. Vol. 5. 2. Pp. 177–190. In Russian.

Morton 2009 – Morton T. Ecology without nature: Rethinking environmental aesthetics. Cambridge, MA, 2009.

Morton 2017 – Morton T. Why ecological awareness is loopy. Imagining Earth: Concepts of Wholeness in Cultural Constructions of Our Home Planet. Bielefeld, 2017. Pp. 91–111.

Musin 2007 – Musin A. E. The holy fire: Myth or reality? Moscow, 2007. In Russian.

Pigalev 2021 – Pigalev A. I. Iconoclasm as a subject of visual theology. Journal of Visual Theology. 2021. 2. Pp. 11–24. In Russian.

Sedakova 1998 – Sedakova O. A. The Moralism of art, or on the evil of mediocrity. Art of cinema. 1998. 4. Pp. 69–75. In Russian.

Sedakova 2005 – Sedakova O. A. Church Slavonic-Russian paronyms: Materials for a dictionary. Moscow, 2005. In Russian.

Schtein 2009 – Schtein S. Yu. The phenomenon of Orthodox cinema: Trends and ways of comprehension. Russian Cinema of Recent Years in Search of Self-Identification (2003‒2008). Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific Conference. Part 1. Moscow, 2009. Pp. 60–83. In Russian.

Tanner 1997 – Tanner K. Theories of culture: A new agenda for theology. Minneapolis, 1997.

Tomalin 2009 – Tomalin E. Biodivinity and biodiversity: The limits to religious environmentalism. London, 2009.

Yannaras 1984 – Yannaras Chr. The freedom of morality. Crestwood, NY, 1984.

Yannaras 2013 – Yannaras Chr. Against religion. Brookline, 2013.

About authors

Alexander V. Markov
Dr. Sci. (Philology),
Professor of Cinema and Contemporary Art Department
Russian State University for the Humanities
6, Miusskaya Sq., Moscow, 125047, Russian Federation
E-mail: markovius@gmail.com

Oksana A. Shtayn
Cand. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor
Ural Federal University
51, Lenina Av., Yekaterinburg, 620075, Russian Federation
E-mail: shtaynshtayn@gmail.com

For citation:
Markov A. V., Shtayn O. A. Icons of the material: Contemporary art, new materialisms, and visual theology. Journal of Visual Theology. 2026. Vol. 8. 1. Pp. 98–118. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2026-8-1-98-118

Published
2026-06-22
How to Cite
Markov , A. V. (2026). Icons of the material: Contemporary art, new materialisms, and visual theology. Journal of Visual Theology, 8(1), 98-118. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/182
Section
Articles
Views
0
Downloads
0