Religious art and museum representation: historical aspects, challenges and prospects

Keywords: visual presentation of cultural values, church art, museum, exhibition, discourse, restitution

Abstract

The study is devoted to the practice of museum representation of religious values ​​and the discourse associated with it. Museum activities represent a complex process of rethinking the historical past, shaping cultural identity, and updating value strategies and narratives sought by society. The museum functions as a field of interaction between various institutional actors, memory communities, and media platforms, reflecting its role in the construction of sociocultural meanings. An important aspect of museum practice is assessing the potential of church institutions claiming responsibility for the preservation of religious works of art. This involves critically examining their organizational, financial, technical, and scientific resources necessary to ensure the comprehensive study and public display of these objects. Each such case requires tailored solutions that consider both spiritual and religious as well as cultural and museum-related parameters, as well as the balance between the educational mission of museums and respect for tradition. In this regard, a discourse analysis of the statements of one of the leading figures in Russian cultural policy, M. B. Piotrovsky, is important. He emphasizes that sacred meaning today prevails over artistic value. The study revealed dynamic processes transforming the status of museums in society, redefining key concepts such as heritage, preservation, and cultural appropriation. Thus, the object of this research is the formation of a complex discourse that intertwines aspects of cultural policy, museum scholarship, religious studies approaches, and ethical norms. Analysis of this problematic allows us to understand the mechanisms of cultural representation of religious heritage and expand our understanding of the role of the museum as a space for dialogue between the sacred and the secular. The contemporary discourse on the museification of religious objects is at the intersection of several key issues: the balance between preservation and accessibility, the interpretation of the sacred context in the secular space of the museum, and the place of the individual as a subject of religious and cultural experience within the context of a church and museum. The discourse under study is influenced by globalization and digital processes, as well as changes in public consciousness. These factors influence the formation of public perception of heritage, as well as the methods and strategies of its preservation, scientific analysis and popularization, emphasizing the need to adapt museum practices to modern challenges and socio-cultural expectations.

Author Biography

О. А. Ryzhkova, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-2-329-343

Olga A. Ryzhkova
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University,
Veliky Novgorod, Russia
s244681@std.novsu.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-4111

Abstract
The study is devoted to the practice of museum representation
of religious values ​​and the discourse associated with it. Museum activities represent a complex process of rethinking the historical past, shaping cultural identity, and updating value strategies
and narratives sought by society. The museum functions as a field
of interaction between various institutional actors, memory communities, and media platforms, reflecting its role
in the construction of sociocultural meanings. An important aspect
of museum practice is assessing the potential of church institutions claiming responsibility for the preservation of religious works of art. This involves critically examining their organizational, financial, technical, and scientific resources necessary to ensure
the comprehensive study and public display of these objects.
Each such case requires tailored solutions that consider both spiritual and religious as well as cultural and museum-related parameters, as well as the balance between the educational mission of museums and respect for tradition. In this regard, a discourse analysis of the statements of one of the leading figures in Russian cultural policy, M. B. Piotrovsky, is important. He emphasizes that sacred meaning today prevails over artistic value. The study revealed dynamic processes transforming the status of museums
in society, redefining key concepts such as heritage, preservation,
and cultural appropriation. Thus, the object of this research is
the formation of a complex discourse that intertwines aspects
of cultural policy, museum scholarship, religious studies approaches, and ethical norms. Analysis of this problematic allows us to understand the mechanisms of cultural representation
of religious heritage and expand our understanding of the role
of the museum as a space for dialogue between the sacred
and the secular. The contemporary discourse on the museification
of religious objects is at the intersection of several key issues:
the balance between preservation and accessibility,
the interpretation of the sacred context in the secular space
of the museum, and the place of the individual as a subject
of religious and cultural experience within the context of a church
and museum. The discourse under study is influenced by globalization and digital processes, as well as changes in public consciousness. These factors influence the formation of public perception of heritage, as well as the methods and strategies of
its preservation, scientific analysis and popularization, emphasizing the need to adapt museum practices to modern challenges
and socio-cultural expectations.

Keywords: visual presentation of cultural values, church art, museum, exhibition, discourse, restitution

References

Butler 2007 – Butler В. Return to Alexandria. An ethnography
of cultural heritage, revivalism, and museum memory.
London, New York, 2007.

Chuvilova 2009 – Chuvilova I. V. Classification of museums
and heritage issues. Museum. 2009. 5. Pp. 20–25. In Russian.

Dunas 2024 – Dunas D. V. Media consumption as a field
of interdisciplinary analysis. Moscow University Bulletin.
Series 10: Journalism.
2024. 6. Pp. 115–135. In Russian.

Eco 1998 – Eco U. La Struttura Assente. Transl. into Russian
by V. Reznik, A. Pogonyailo. St. Petersburg, 1998.

Florinsky 1879 – Florinsky V. M. Project of the public historical
and ethnographic museum at the Kazan Society of Archeology,
History and Ethnography. Kazan, 1879. In Russian.

Kirilov 1845 ‒ Kirilov N. Pocket dictionary of foreign words included in the Russian language. St. Petersburg, 1845. In Russian.

Laclau 2003 – Laclau E. The Impossibility of Society. Transl. into Russian by A. Smirnov. Logos. 2003. 4‒5 (39). Pp. 54‒57.

Maxim the Confessor 2006 – Maxim the Confessor. Works. Transl. into Russian. Chelyabinsk, 2006.

Poluekhtova 1993 – Poluekhtova I. A. American cinema as a means
of cultural expansion. Dissertation for the degree of Cand. Sci. in Sociology. Moscow, 1993. In Russian.

Polyakov 2011 – Polyakov T. P. Sergiev Posad Museum-Reserve:
the ideal project and the reality of history. Essays on the history
of the city of Sergiev Posad: the end of the 18th – 20th centuries. Moscow, 2011. Pp. 423–465. In Russian.

Ryzhkova 2024 – Ryzhkova O. A. Museum: Discourse analysis
of the concept. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series:
Philology. Journalism
. 2024. 1. Pp. 51–54. In Russian.

Shlyakhtina 2013 – Shlyakhtina L. M. The contemporary museology: Horizons of theoretical studies. The Problems of Museology. 2013. 1. Pp. 12–18. In Russian.

Van Dijk 2013 – Van Dijk T. A. Discourse and knowledge. Transl. into Russian by E. Kozhemyakin. Belgorod State University Scientific Bulletin. Series: Humanities. 2013. 13 (156). Is. 18. Pp. 5‒23.

Vartanova 2019 – Vartanova E. L. Media theory: domestic discourse. Moscow, 2019. In Russian.

Volkova 2020 – Volkova E. V. Christian Art in Museums: Modern Techniques of Exposition. Journal of Visual Theology. 2020. 1. Рp. 114‒124. In Russian.

Wodak 2006 – Wodak R. Mediation Between Discourse and Society: Assessing Cognitive Approaches in CDA. Transl. into Russian by O. Solopova. Political Linguistics. 2006. 7 (19). Pp. 107–116.

About author

Olga A. Ryzhkova
Senior Lecturer
Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University
41, Bolshaya Sankt-Peterburgskaya St., Veliky Novgorod, 173003, Russian Federation
E-mail: s244681@std.novsu.ru

For citation:
Ryzhkova O. A. Religious art and museum representation: historical aspects, challenges and prospects. Journal of Visual Theology. 2025. Vol. 7. 2. Pp. 329–343. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-2-329-343

Published
2025-11-20
How to Cite
RyzhkovaО. А. (2025). Religious art and museum representation: historical aspects, challenges and prospects. Visual Theology, 7(2), 329-343. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/164
Section
Articles
Views
31
Downloads
8