Visualization of eschatological semiotics in informational discourses of modern marginal Orthodoxy

Keywords: visual discourse, folk religiosity, marginal religiosity, eschatology, apocalypticism

Abstract

At present, eschatological and apocalyptic issues are acting as a stable driver for the development of popular religious discourse. At the same time, marginal groups of religious people are actively using apocalyptic semantics on the Internet to develop their own pragmatic strategies. Eschatology is a hermeneutical model that allows basic mythologems to be combined into a coherent system. Eschatological thinking simultaneously forms the context for the interaction of these mythologems and provides a tool for their interpretation and transmission. The important semiotics element of modern eschatological visualizations is the precedent text by analogy with which new images are constructed. That eschatological semiotics is well represented in the non-canonical iconography of the holy Youth Vyacheslav (Slavik Chebarkulsky). While there is a combination of elements from various semiotic codes, the horse, determined by the iconic plot, is replaced by a bicycle, and the ‘snake’ is replaced with an image of a dinosaur. Active semiotization of eschatological plots, actualized through opportunistic hermeneutic interpretation of modern events, includes graphic images that are conditioned by artistic interpretations of repressions from the 1930s to 1950s. At the same time, stereotyped plots and images migrate from one alarmist publication to another. The corresponding visual discourse also includes standard elements of computer graphics widely circulated on the internet, such as emoticons, which have simplified and caricatured facial features. The kinship of these images with some aspects of rock culture is not in doubt. In addition, the dynamic of the pictorial eschatological narrative was actively influenced by the information environment in a global epidemic situation. The appropriate semiotic code combines traditional and modern elements

Author Biography

V. Yu. Lebedev, Tver State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-1-136-150

Vladimir Yu. Lebedev
Tver State University, Tver, Russia
semion.religare@yandex.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4840-3135

Alexander M. Prilutskii
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia,
St. Petersburg, Russia
alpril@mail.ru
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7013-9935

Abstract
At present, eschatological and apocalyptic issues are acting as
a stable driver for the development of popular religious discourse.
At the same time, marginal groups of religious people are actively using apocalyptic semantics on the Internet to develop their own pragmatic strategies. Eschatology is a hermeneutical model that allows basic mythologems to be combined into a coherent system. Eschatological thinking simultaneously forms the context for
the interaction of these mythologems and provides a tool for their interpretation and transmission. The important semiotics element
of modern eschatological visualizations is the precedent text by analogy with which new images are constructed. That eschatological semiotics is well represented in the non-canonical iconography of the holy Youth Vyacheslav (Slavik Chebarkulsky). While there is
a combination of elements from various semiotic codes, the horse, determined by the iconic plot, is replaced by a bicycle, and
the ‘snake’ is replaced with an image of a dinosaur. Active semiotization of eschatological plots, actualized through opportunistic hermeneutic interpretation of modern events, includes graphic images that are conditioned by artistic interpretations of repressions from the 1930s to 1950s. At the same time, stereotyped plots and images migrate from one alarmist publication to another. The corresponding visual discourse also includes standard elements of computer graphics widely circulated on the internet, such as emoticons, which have simplified and caricatured facial features. The kinship of these images with some aspects of rock culture is not in doubt. In addition, the dynamic of the pictorial eschatological narrative was actively influenced
by the information environment in a global epidemic situation.
The appropriate semiotic code combines traditional and modern elements.

Keywords: visual discourse, folk religiosity, marginal religiosity, eschatology, apocalypticism

References

Abramova 2007 – Abramova L. V. Functional characteristics of
the icon. Mordovia University Bulletin. 2007. 2. Pp. 248‒253.
In Russian.

Bochkov 2021 – Bochkov P., priest. Zosimovites: History of the non-canonical group of the ‘Schimitropolitan’ Zosima. The Lord’s Field. Bulletin of Penza Theological Seminary. 2021. 1 (19). Pp. 97–104.
In Russian.

Buseva-Davydova 2020 – Buseva-Davydova I. L. Folk icon: towards the definition of the subject. Russian Foundation for Basic Research Journal. 2000. 3. Pp. 216‒225. In Russian.

Kiuru 2017 – Kiuru K. V. Visualization of the athlete’s image:
from the icon of socialist realism to the selfie as an icon of glamour. Integrated Communications in Sports and Tourism: Education, Trends, International Experience. 2017. Vol. 1. Pp. 117–121. In Russian.

Lanshchikova 2019 – Lanshchikova G. A. Spatial-time concept images of religious world view in icon. Review of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research. 2019. 2 (23). Pp. 17‒21. In Russian.

Lebedev 2013 – Lebedev V. Yu. On cultural typology and peculiarities of religious praxis. Religion. Church. Society. 2013. 2. Pp. 39–51.
In Russian.

Lebedev, Prilutsky 2024 –Lebedev V., Prilutsky A. «Мladostarchestvo» in the context of church policy of post-perestroika. PolitBook. 2024. 3. Pp. 172‒179. In Russian.

Mitasova 2018 – Mitasova S. A. Non-canonical icons in modern orthodox culture of Russia. Bulletin of East-Siberian State Institute of Culture. 2018. 4 (8). Pp. 145‒153. In Russian.

Podvalnov 2021 – Podvalnov E. D. Reality and canon in icons and small plastic arts that reflect Russian military affairs: to the problem statement. New Historical Perspectives: From the Baltic to the Pacific Ocean. 2021. 4 (25). Pp. 24‒36. In Russian.

Prilutsky 2016 – Prilutsky A. M. “Stalin’s myth” in religious and parareligious discourses. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series “Humanitarian and Social Sciences”. 2016. 2. Pp. 87–95. In Russian.

Prilutsky 2020 – Prilutsky A. M. Myth-theological Narrative about Three Echelons in Modern Eschatological Discourses of Orthodox Subcultures. Proceedings of the Department of Theology of
the St. Petersburg Theological Academy.
2020. 1 (5). Pp. 45–53.
In Russian.

Prilutsky 2023 a – Prilutsky A. M. Monarchic Mytho-Theologemes of the Modern Fundamentalist Discourse: Hermeneutical Specificity. The Bulletin of Irkutsk State University. Series Political Science
and Religion Studies
. 2023. Vol. 43. Pp. 81‒90. In Russian.

Prilutsky 2023 b – Terms and concepts of radical religious subcultures. Ed. by A. M. Prilutsky. St. Petersburg, 2023. In Russian.

Rutsinskaya 2020 – Rutsinskaya I. I. From ‘hagiography’ to ‘icon’: written sources of Stalin’s imagery. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 19. Linguistics and Intercultural Communication. 2020. 1. Pp. 70‒80. In Russian.

Stepanov 1998 – Stepanov Yu. S. Language and method.
Toward a modern philosophy of language. Moscow, 1998.
In Russian.

Tkachenko 2018 – Tkachenko V. S. The Eastern Christian Aesthesis:
A Body and “Energies” of an Icon. Scientific Papers of St. Petersburg Academy of Fine Arts. 2018. 47. Pp. 15‒27. In Russian.

Yurasоv, Tanina 2019 – Yurasоv I. A., Tanina M. A. Phenomenon of Marginal Religious Identity: Discourse, Structure. Izvestiya of Saratov University. (N. S.). Ser. Sociology. Politology. 2019. Vol. 19. 3. Pp. 279–283. In Russian.

Zolotareva 2005 – Zolotareva E. V. Integral sociology of P. Sorokin. Society and Law. 2005. 17. Pp. 166–173. In Russian.

Zygmont 2016 – Zygmont A. I. Contemporary parish milieu as
the community in the situation of the sacrificial crisis. Researches
in Religious Studies
. 2016. 1 (13). Pp. 151‒189. In Russian.

About authors

Vladimir Yu. Lebedev
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy),
Professor of Theology Department
Tver State University
33, Zhelyabova St., Tver, 170100, Russian Federation
E-mail: semion.religare@yandex.ru

Alexander M. Prilutskii
Dr. Sci. (Philosophy), Associate Professor
Head of History of Religions and Theology Department,
Director of Institute of History and Social Sciences
Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
48, Moika Embankment, St. Petersburg, 191186, Russian Federation
E-mail: alpril@mail.ru

For citation:
Lebedev V. Yu., Prilutskii A. M. Visualization of eschatological semiotics in informational discourses of modern marginal Orthodoxy. Journal of Visual Theology. 2025. Vol. 7. 1. Pp. 136–150. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2025-7-1-136-150

Published
2025-06-26
How to Cite
Lebedev, V. Y., & Prilutskii, A. M. (2025). Visualization of eschatological semiotics in informational discourses of modern marginal Orthodoxy. Visual Theology, 7(1), 136-150. Retrieved from https://visualtheology.ru/index.php/journal/article/view/155
Section
Articles
Views
22
Downloads
4