Intervisuality in Iconographical Studies of Speculum Humanae Salvationis

M. A. Rogov

M. A. Rogov Dubna State University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-3370

Ключевые слова: iconography, visual typology, bimediality, intervisuality, intertextuality, parergonality, Speculum humanae salvationis

Аннотация

This article analyses iconographic research into Speculum humanae salvationis (SHS) based on the methodological concept of intervisuality. After consideration of the historiographical investigation into the iconography and corpus of the manuscripts, the typology and bimediality of SHS, attention then focuses on aspects of intervisuality which play an important role in the iconographic programme of SHS. Visual intertextuality manifests itself in the relationship between depictions, texts and contexts: first, the compositional parallelism of antitype and types in the illustrated chapter of SHS; secondly, the correspondence between depictions and textual features in SHS sources; thirdly, compatibility of depictions and texts which are not SHS sources but have a bearing on its context; fourthly, links between the depictions and references to other texts and allegories outside the SHS text. A hypothesis is suggested for possible influence of the “monastic-labour” motif in the historiated initials of Cistercian manuscripts concerning the oak tree parable as an allegory for exegesis. Key factors shaping the intervisuality were patronage, the process of producing manuscripts and the history of their use and parergonality.

Биография автора

M. A. Rogov , Dubna State University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2024-6-1-77-101

Mikhail A. Rogov
Dubna State University, Dubna, Russian Federation
Foundation for the Promotion of Education, Science and Art
“New Art Studies”,
St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
rogovm@hotmail.com
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7573-3370

Abstract
This article analyses iconographic research into Speculum humanae salvationis (SHS) based on the methodological concept of intervisuality. After consideration of the historiographical investigation into the iconography and corpus of the manuscripts, the typology and bimediality of SHS, attention then focuses
on aspects of intervisuality which play an important role in
the iconographic programme of SHS. Visual intertextuality manifests itself in the relationship between depictions, texts and contexts: first, the compositional parallelism of antitype and types in
the illustrated chapter of SHS; secondly, the correspondence between depictions and textual features in SHS sources; thirdly, compatibility of depictions and texts which are not SHS sources but have a bearing on its context; fourthly, links between the depictions and references to other texts and allegories outside the SHS text.
A hypothesis is suggested for possible influence of the “monastic-labour” motif in the historiated initials of Cistercian manuscripts concerning the oak tree parable as an allegory for exegesis. Key factors shaping the intervisuality were patronage, the process of producing manuscripts and the history of their use and parergonality.

Keywords: iconography, visual typology, bimediality, intervisuality, intertextuality, parergonality, Speculum humanae salvationis

References

As-Vijvers, Korteweg 2018 – Korteweg A. S., As-Vijvers A. M. W. Splendour of the Burgundian Netherlands: Southern Netherlandish Illuminated Manuscripts in Dutch Collections. Utrecht, 2018.

Breitenbach 1930 – Breitenbach E. Speculum humanae salvationis. Eine typengeschichtliche Untersuchung. Strassburg, 1930.

Camille 1991 – Camille M. Gothic Signs and the Surplus: The Kiss
on the Cathedral. Yale French Studies. Special Issue. Contexts:
Style and Values in Medieval Art and Literature. 1991. Pp. 151–170.

Capra, Floridi 2023 – Capra A., Floridi L. Intervisuality:
New Approaches to Greek Literature. Berlin, 2023.

Cardon 1996 – Cardon B. Manuscripts of the Speculum Humanae Salvationis in the Southern Netherlands (c. 1410 – c. 1470).
A Contribution to the Study of the 15^th Century Book Illumination and of the Function and Meaning of Historical Symbolism. Leuven, 1996.

Charalampidis 1995 – Charalampidis C. P. The dendrites in the pre-Christian and Christian historical-literary tradition and iconography. Rome, 1995.

Heller-Andrist 2012 – Heller-Andrist S. The Friction of the Frame: Derrida’s Parergon in Literature. Tübingen, 2012.

Heyder 2014 – Heyder J. C. Corporate Design Made in Ghent / Bruges? On the Extensive Re-use of Patterns in Late Medieval Flemish Illuminated Manuscripts. The Use of Models in Medieval Book Painting. Ed. by Monika E. Müller. Newcastle upon Tyne, 2014. Pp. 167–201.

Horrox 1994 – Horrox R. The Black Death. Manchester, 1994.

Hourihane 2012 – The Grove Encyclopedia of Medieval Art and Architecture. Ed. by C. P. Hourihane. Vol. 1. Oxford, 2012.

Kramarić 2019 – Kramarić M. Zrcalo člověčaskago spasenja (1445): Transkripcija, kontekst nastanka i jezičnopovijesna analiza. Zagreb, 2019.

Lang 1957 – Lang S. Bomarzo. Architectural Review. 1957. Vol. 121 (June). Pp. 427–430.

Mitchell 1994 – Mitchell W. J. T. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago, 1994.

Palmer 2009 – Palmer N. F. “Turning many to righteousness”: Religious didacticism in the Speculum humanae salvationis and the similitude of the oak tree. Dichtung und Didaxe: Lehrhaftes Sprechen in der deutschen Literatur des Mittelalters. Berlin, 2009. Pp. 345–368.

Parker 1844 – Parker J. H. Morals on the Book of Job by St. Gregory the Great, translated with notes and indices. Vol. 2. London, Oxford, 1844.

Posset 2018 – Posset F. Pater Bernhardus: Martin Luther and Bernard of Clairvaux. Collected Works. Vol. 2. Eugene, Oregon, 2018.

Robbe 2010 – Robbe J. R. Der mittelniederländische Spieghel onser behoudenisse und seine lateinische Quelle Text, Kontext und Funktion. Münster, 2010.

Robbins 2008 – Robbins V. K. Rhetography: A New Way of Seeing the Familiar Text. Words Well Spoken: George Kennedys Rhetoric of the New Testament. Waco, TX, 2008. Pp. 81–106.

Schmolinsky 1991 – Schmolinsky S. Der Apocalypsenkommentar des Alexander Minorita: Zur Frühen Rezeption Joachims von Fiore in Deutschland. Hannover, 1991.

Schneegans 1920 – Schneegans F-É. Sur la date du Mors de la Pomme. Romania. 1920. Vol. XLVI. Pp. 536–570.

Thomas 1970 – Thomas M. Zur kulturgeschichtlichen Einordnung der Armenbibel mit ‘Speculum Humanae Salvationis’ unter Berücksichtigung einer Darstellung des ‘Liber Figurarum’ in der Joachim de Fiore Handschrift der Sächsischen Landesbibliothek Dresden (Mscr. Dresden A 121). Archiv für Kulturgeschichte. 1970. Vol. 52. S. 192–225.

Vanwijnsberghe 2006 – Vanwijnsberghe D. Marketing Books for Burghers: Jean Markant’s Activity in Tournai, Lille and Bruges. Flemish Manuscript Painting in Context: Recent Research. Los Angeles, 2006. Pp. 135–148.

Vorgarine 2012 – Voragine J. de. The Golden Legend. Princeton, 2012.

Warnar 2007 – Warnar G. ‘Eyn leyen bokelijn, dat sal mit bilden al untworpen sijn’. Speculum humanae salvationis in Het Nederland. Spiegel der Letteren. 2007. Vol. 49 (2). B. 102–122.

Wilson, Wilson 1984 – Wilson A., Wilson J. L. A Medieval Mirror. Berkeley, 1984.

About author

Mikhail A. Rogov
Cand. Sci. (Art History), Cand. Sci. (Economics),
Associate Professor
Dubna State University
19, Universitetskaya St., Dubna, 141980, Russian Federation
Scientific Director of the Center for Iconographic
and Visual Studies (CIVIS)
Foundation for the Promotion of Education, Science and Art
“New Art Studies”
43/1, Lermontovsky Avenue, St. Petersburg, 190103,
Russian Federation
E-mail: rogovm@hotmail.com

For citation:
Rogov M. A. Intervisuality in iconographical studies of Speculum humanae salvationis. Journal of Visual Theology. 2024. Vol. 6. 1.
Pp. 77–101. https://doi.org/10.34680/vistheo-2024-6-1-77-101